• HQ -
  • ACTIVITIES -
  • ULTIMATE PARENT -
Non-performer
TOTAL SCORE OUT OF 100
OF 30 (0%)
Set and strengthen goals
OF 33 (0%)
Implement ethical supply chains
OF 20 (0%)
Report progress
OF 11 (0%)
Increase transparency
OF 6 (0%)
Collaborate for change

Set and strengthen goals

Out of 30
+ BONUS
0

Protection of forests and other natural ecosystems

Out of 16
+0 BONUS
Out of 2
Existence of public deforestation/conversion commitments
Does the company have a public commitment to 100% no-conversion production/sourcing (as defined by AFi), regardless of market demand?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 6
Cutoff dates
Do deforestation/conversion commitments specify a clear cutoff date? Is it aligned with AF guidance? Where existing regional commodity/sector cutoff dates exist, are those followed?
  • Amazon No
  • Cerrado No
  • Gran Chaco No
  • Pampas No
  • Chiquitania No
  • Espinal No
  • Pantanal No
  • Danube Delta No
  • Northern Great Plains No
  • Global (all other biomes) No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Deforestation/conversion – Scope of commitments
Do deforestation/conversion commitments include a clear definition of the scope to which they are applicable?
  • All operations, all subsidiaries, all divisions and import markets No
  • All types of soy traded (soybeans, soybean meal and soybean oil) No
  • All regions/biomes No
  • All direct and indirect suppliers No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 3
Achievement date
How quickly has the company committed to achieving its deforestation/conversion commitments?
  • No
  • When was this target/date last reviewed or updated? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 3
Interim targets and milestones
Do the company's commitments to eliminate deforestation and conversion specify time-bound targets and milestones?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Respect for human rights

Out of 8
+0 BONUS
Out of 2
Existence of public human rights commitment
Does the company have a public commitment to respect internationally recognized human rights (including workers, indigenous peoples and local communities) and ensure this respect equally for all persons and groups?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Human rights - Scope of commitments
Do human rights commitments include a clear definition of the scope to which they are applicable?
  • All operations, all subsidiaries, all divisions and import markets No
  • All types of soy traded (soybeans, soybean meal and soybean oil) No
  • All regions/biomes No
  • All direct and indirect suppliers No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Human rights - FPIC
Does the company commit to or have a supplier policy that requires suppliers to secure the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) of potentially affected Indigenous peoples and/or local communities before acquiring new interests in land or resources, new developments or expansions?
  • No
  • Is the company's FPIC commitment or policy fully aligned with key elements of an effective FPIC process outlined in the Accountability Framework? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
FPIC - Scope of commitments
Does the FPIC commitments include a clear definition of the scope to which they are applicable?
  • All operations, all subsidiaries, all divisions and import markets No
  • All types of soy traded (soybeans, soybean meal and soybean oil) No
  • All regions/biomes No
  • All direct and indirect suppliers No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Traceability

Out of 6
+0 BONUS
Out of 2
Traceability
Has the company made a commitment to traceability of the soy it sources? To what level of traceability does the company commit?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Traceability - Scope of commitments
Do the company's traceability commitments include a clear definition of the scope to which they are applicable?
  • All operations, all subsidiaries, all divisions and import markets No
  • All types of soy traded (soybeans, soybean meal and soybean oil) No
  • All regions/biomes No
  • All direct and indirect suppliers No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Traceability - Achievement date
How quickly has the company committed to achieving its traceability commitments?
  • No
  • When was this target/date last reviewed or updated? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS

Implement ethical supply chains

Out of 33
+ BONUS
0

Company systems and processes

Out of 2
+0 BONUS
Out of 1
Board oversight
Does the company’s board have a committee or is there a high-level management position that is formally focused on deforestation/ conversion-related issues?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 0
Executive compensation
Does the company link executive compensation to deforestation-related issues?
  • No
  • What is the percentage of pay at risk? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 1
Grievance mechanism
Does the company have grievance mechanisms in place to identify and remedy adverse social and environmental impacts linked to their operations and/or supply chain? What is the nature of the grievance mechanism used by the company (own mechanism, that of external entity, etc.)?
  • No
  • Is it publicly available to all stakeholders? No
  • Is there a description of the process and procedures that are followed when a grievance is raised? No
  • Are grievances and responses or resolutions published? No
  • What is the nature of the grievance mechanism used by the company (own mechanism, external entity, etc.)? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Supply chain assessment

Out of 2
+0 BONUS
Out of 1
Risk assessment and due diligence
Does the company conduct risk assessments related to deforestation/conversion risk? Are the results of the assessments made publicly available?
  • No
  • Are the results published? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 1
Compliance with applicable laws
Does the company conduct assessments to ensure that their operations and supply chains comply with all applicable laws?
  • No
  • Do these assessments include potential future changes to regulatory frameworks? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Managing for supply chain compliance

Out of 19
+0 BONUS
Out of 2
Embedded into decision-making
Has the company embedded its commitment to deforestation or conversion free soy into decision-making processes and systems? Specifically, has the company set a policy or process for trading desks and procurement teams to assess compliance? Do trade desks and procurement managers have a list of companies that are excluded or need to be assessed more carefully due to their involvement in deforestation/conversion?
  • Does the company have a policy or process for procurement teams and trading desks to assess compliance against its commitments and include that in decision-making? No
  • Do trade desks and procurement managers have a list of non-compliant suppliers that should be excluded due to their involvement in deforestation? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Operations and supplier engagement: thresholds
Does the company have specific thresholds/triggers for supplier suspension in case of non-compliance?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 5
Operations and supplier engagement: time-bound plans
Does the company set time-bound action plans for non-compliant operations and suppliers in order to address and remedy non-compliance?
  • No
  • If yes, does the company sets time-bound action plans for farm-level suppliers, including indirect suppliers? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Engagement with non-compliant suppliers
Does the company offer support to its suppliers to help them achieve compliance with commitments? What percentage of the company's supply chain volume are represented by suppliers currently in receiving that support?
  • No
  • Type of support: No
  • How many of the company's suppliers are currently receiving this support? No
  • What percentage of the company's volume is represented by suppliers that are supported? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 0
Supporting expansion of soy on cleared land
Does the company provide technical and/or financial support to soy producers to encourage expansion of soy on already cleared land?
  • No
  • How many producers are currently receiving this support? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 4
Environmental and social impact assessments
Does the company conduct or facilitate (or require suppliers to conduct or facilitate) environmental and social impact assessments for new site development or land acquisition?
  • Does the company conduct environmental and social impact assessments for any new site development or land acquisition conducted by the company? No
  • Are suppliers required to conduct environmental and social impact assessments for new site development or land acquisition? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 4
Remediation and restoration
Does the company provide remedy to (or require and support all suppliers that own or manage land to provide remedy to) any harms in case of negative social impacts associated with the company's prior actions or land management practices and/or restore any land converted after the cut off date?
  • For company-owned or managed land: Does the company provide remedy to social impacts? No
  • For company-owned or managed land: Does the company restore land deforested after the cut off date? No
  • For suppliers: Are suppliers required to provide remedy to social impacts? No
  • For suppliers: Are suppliers required to restore land converted after the cutoff date? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Supplier requirements

Out of 4
+0 BONUS
Out of 4
Supplier commitment requirements
Does the company require that suppliers have commitments to (1) zero deforestation and conversion (2) respect human rights?
  • Zero deforestation and conversion commitment No
  • Human rights commitment covering both workers rights and rights of Indigenous peoples and local communities No
  • Commitment to respect FPIC of local communities No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Monitoring and verification

Out of 6
+0 BONUS
Out of 1
Direct supplier monitoring
Does the company monitor direct suppliers (e.g., soy producers) against deforestation and conversion requirements?
  • No
  • Are results made publicly available? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 1
Indirect supplier monitoring
Does the company monitor intermediaries (e.g. aggregators, other traders, brokers, silo owners, cooperatives, etc.)?
  • No
  • Are results made publicly available? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 1
Indirect supplier monitoring – farms of origin
Does the company monitor intermediaries' farms of origin (e.g. original producers of soy purchased by intermediaries) against its deforestation and conversion requirements?
  • No
  • Are results made publicly available? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 3
Quality of monitoring protocols
Have civil society organisations participated in the development of the protocols? Are monitoring protocols made publicly available? Are supplier monitoring reports/outcomes third-party verified?
  • Have civil society organizations participated in the development of monitoring protocols? No
  • Are monitoring protocols made publicly available? No
  • Are supplier monitoring reports/outcomes third-party verified? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS

Report progress

Out of 20
+ BONUS
0

Outcomes: deforestation and conversion

Out of 15
+0 BONUS
Out of 8
Compliance with deforestation and conversion commitments: reporting
Has the company reported on progress on commitment implementation in 2019 or 2020?
  • No
  • In the latest reporting cycle, what percentage of soy volume in the company's operations or supply chain was compliant with no deforestation/conversion standards? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 4
Compliance with deforestation and conversion commitments: verification
How is this compliance percentage calculated?
  • No
  • Is the company's progress reporting independently verified? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 3
Exposure to deforestation risk in South America
How exposed is the company to deforestation risk in South America?
  • Brazil No
  • Bolivien No
  • Argentina No
  • Paraguay No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Outcomes: traceability

Out of 5
+0 BONUS
Out of 3
Compliance with traceability commitments - reporting
Does the company publicly report on traceability of its soy supply chains? What percentage of soy in the company's supply chain is traceable to the country of origin? To a sub-national origin (e.g. state or municipality)? To the farm?
  • No
  • Percentage traceable to second-level jurisdiction (e.g. municipality level) No
  • Percentage traceable to farm No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 2
Compliance with traceability commitments - verification
How is this compliance percentage calculated? Is the company's progress reporting independently verified?
  • No
  • Calculation methods No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS

Increase transparency

Out of 11
+ BONUS
0

Company information and exposure

Out of 8
+0 BONUS
Out of 3
Volumes and sourcing area
Does the company disclose volumes of soybeans purchased annually? Are they disaggregated by country and by biome/subnational sourcing area?
  • No
  • Total volume No
  • Brazil: Cerrado No
  • Brazil: Amazon No
  • Brazil: Matopiba No
  • Brazil: Pantanal No
  • Brazil: Atlantic Forest No
  • Argentina: Gran Chaco No
  • Argentina: Pampa No
  • Argentina: Espinal No
  • Paraguay: Gran Chaco No
  • Paraguay: Atlantic Forest No
  • Bolivia: Chiquitania No
  • Bolivia: Amazon No
  • US: Northern Great Plains No
  • Europe: Danube Delta No
  • Others No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 1
Volumes produced on own farms/direct sourced/third-party sourced
Does the company disclose proportion of soy produced on own farms, sourced from producers or sourced from other third-party suppliers in 2019 or 2020?
  • Produced on own farms No
  • Sourced directly from producers No
  • Sourced from other third-party suppliers No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 1
Company operations
Does the company publicly disclose the location of company-owned processing facilities?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 3
Supplier and farm of origin list
Does the company disclose the identity and/or location of its direct and indirect suppliers, and of all farms of origin?
  • For direct suppliers No
  • For indirect suppliers No
  • Farm of origin No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Certification

Out of 1
+0 BONUS
Out of 1
Certification
What percentage of soy used, produced or traded by the company is certified? Which certification schemes and models (e.g. identity preserved, segregated, mass balance, book and claim) are used? If the company has its own certification scheme, is it made publicly available?
  • Certification scheme No
  • Certified volume under credits No
  • Certified volume mass balance No
  • Certified volume segregated No
  • Total certified volume No
  • Total certified volume as percentage of all volumes No
  • If the company has its own certification scheme, is it made publicly available? No
  • Traceability process No
  • Supplier requirements No
  • Cutoff date No
  • Are at least 50% of volumes sourced under either identity preserved or segregated chain of custody models? No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Policy advocacy

Out of 1
+0 BONUS
Out of 1
Political Disclosures
Does the company disclose all of its political contributions and campaign expenditures at all jurisdictional levels?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 0
Advocacy
Does the company actively advocate for regulatory frameworks that enable progress towards soy supply chains free of deforestation, conversion, and human rights abuses?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
0

Survey Response

Out of 1
+0 BONUS
Out of 1
Response
Did the company respond to the scorecard survey?
  • No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS

Collaborate for change

Out of 6
+ BONUS
0

Collaborate for change

Out of 6
+0 BONUS
Out of 3
Collaboration in producer countries
Is the company a member of biome-specific working groups to tackle deforestation and conversion for soy (and other commodities) in the biomes it sources from?
  • No
  • Initiatives No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS
Out of 3
Collaboration in import markets
Is the company a member of initiatives in import markets that advocate for zero deforestation and conversion in soy supply chains (or across commodities)?
  • No
  • Initiatives No
COMMENTS AND DETAILS